AMZNB/USDT 0.25%
LiveSources differ by figure; each one shows its own source and time.
TVL
$170.4K
On-chain · block 132,957,561 · 19:08 SGT
Volume 24h
$53K
Derived · LP fees ÷ fee rate, 24h · 19:08 SGT
Pool fee APR (to LPs)
26.9%
On-chain · fee counters, 7d window · 19:08 SGT24h 18.9% · 7d 26.9%39.6% before protocol cut
Vol / TVL
31%
from the two figures left
Price (USDT)
271.36
On-chain · block 132,957,561 · 19:08 SGT
Set a range alert
Net Yield Truth Label
−24.9%
est. net APR at the defaults below
Your fees ≈ pool fee APR 26.9% (LPs' 68% of 39.6%; the protocol keeps the rest) × range concentration 1.60× × time in range 63%
Pool fee APR from On-chain · fee counters, 7d window · 19:08 SGT
Measured: the average pool dollar behaves like a ±13% range. Active liquidity within ±1.3% of the price vs TVL, BNB Chain block 132,927,883, 11 Nov, 15:25 SGT. Our hourly readings over the last 168 h saw denser liquidity at the price (16.0× full range vs 15.0× in that read), so we use what they saw.
- • TVL is under $5M, so fee APR moves a lot day to day.
- • Fee APR rests on unusual volume: the busiest of the last 30 days carried 31% of the volume (points and airdrop farming often looks like this). At a median day's volume the pool fee APR would be about 15%.
- • AMZN only trades in US market hours; this pool trades 24/7. News and earnings land while you can't hedge, and arbitrage reprices the pool in one step at the open (largest daily move in the last 45 days: 10.6%). Out of range below means you hold only the stock.
How this is estimated
- Pool fee APR = trading fees ÷ TVL, from 7-day average volume where available, times the share of fees LPs actually receive. Uniswap v3 (fee switch), PancakeSwap v3 and Aerodrome (unstaked LPs) keep a cut that we read on-chain; Raydium's 84% LP share is from its docs. Token incentives, points and airdrops are excluded.
- That is what an average pool dollar earns. For EVM pools we measure how concentrated that dollar is on-chain: the pool's active liquidity within about a day's typical move of the price, compared with its TVL (idle, out-of-range liquidity counts in TVL but earns nothing).
- Where our own hourly readings saw denser liquidity at the price than that one read (automated managers re-centre as the price moves), we use what the readings saw, so the average dollar is never less concentrated than it has actually been.
- Where we can't read the pool (Solana, or an RPC failure) we fall back to assuming the average dollar behaves like a ±0.5% (stable), ±10% (stock), ±25% (blue-chip) or ±50% (volatile) range, and say so.
- A tighter range earns proportionally more per $ while in range, a wider one less. The advantage is capped at 8×, and your fee APR at 100%.
- Fees only accrue in range. We use the expected share of the horizon in range for a driftless random walk sized by your typical move.
- IL drag = expected loss vs holding at the horizon for your concentrated position, annualized as if you reset the range every horizon.
- Not modelled: compounding, JIT/MEV competition, rebalancing swaps, and fee APR changing over the horizon.
- Range (Coach)
- 249.65 – 293.07
- Capital · horizon
- $10,000 · 30d
- Typical move (1σ) · gas
- ±15% · $1
Range Studio — how would this range have done?
Liquidity around the price
Amazon (AMZN) as an LP position
- Realized move, 30d (1σ)
- ±15.3%
- Worst day (last 45)
- 10.6%
- LP fee APR · median day
- 26.9% · 14.8%
- Token family
- bStocks
Market hours
Pool contract 0x7530beb7bde5843f668cf31b996fa1f748c9b6b1